Television and Shared Experience

A Church article with View Comments posted 30 December 2009.
Tags: , ,

I was listening to NPR’s Laura Sydell yesterday as she and her guests were discussing media trends over the past 40 or 50 years as they connect to shared experience. Old televisionOne guest on the program was arguing that the development of global communications technology means that next-door neighbors may have few shared cultural experiences. In essence, by enabling a large fraction of the population to seek the television news that it wants to watch, the music that it wants to hear, and the political ideas that it wants to think, there are fewer cultural touchstones that we share in common.

In fact, it goes farther that that. Stanford University communications professor Clifford Nass argues that we are witnessing the emergence of the first culture in history which does not offer, on a grassroots level, a set of shared experiences that allow people to build relationships with their neighbors. Even if one doesn’t watch the shows, one knows enough about them to participate in conversation about them, and so they serve whether 100% of the population is engaged or not.

This leads me selfishly to the question of the necessity of television. During my ongoing preparation to become a pastor in the church, I have been repeatedly questioned over my choice not to own a television. Although usually not expressed in such sophisticated terms, my questioners argue that not participating in modern American television watching prevents you from making a connection with your parishioners because you do not participate in those cultural touchstone experiences. The failure to watch television is presented as pastoral irresponsibility.

Of course I disagree with this for several reasons. First, of course there have always been great pastors who have not participated in much TV watching – their entertainment tastes turning more to the arts or literature. When they experience, as all do, a failure in their pastoral care, no one chalks that up to a failure to make a connection through television. Moreover, we now live in a society where the most popular television show in America in 2009, American Idol, only captured 16% of American viewers on its season finale! Gone are the days when millions of Americans watched Walter Cronkite every night and discussed the same news the next day around the water cooler.

These cultural trends also have profound implications for the church. As hundreds of millions of people involve themselves in social networking, new cultural touchstones are developing that transcend neighborhood or regional boundaries. The church can engage these new touchstones, participating in them readily, expressing and confessing the truth we have in these new forums. If we fail, we will become increasingly irrelevant.

While these new cultural trends serve to unite people in very specific ways, the lack of broad, in-person contact between people is alienating. This problem will only grow as time goes on and technology encompasses more of what we do and who we are. Our approach to the problem of alienation should not be merely therapeutic, bandaging the victims, but proactive so that we seek ways to live in this new connectedness. We can be, or become, the Third Place where in-person relationships can flourish.

You might also enjoy:

  1. The Worst Show in the History of Television: Cop Rock
  2. It’s Not Just You
  3. A Sobering Experience
  4. Super Boring?

  • Scot
    As one who owns a TV but watches less and less all the time, one of the trends I have observed is the disconnect between neighbors that is created by TV. TV not only does not offer us common cultural touchstones, it also allows us to mire ourselves in the quagmire of like-mindedness.

    For instance, you can dedicate your TV watching to whatever news channel that will spew out whatever you want to hear, with a perspective that does nothing to challenge you but rather reinforces your already held preconceptions or prejudices about the world. If you want to hear that everything the Democrats say is right watch MSNBC. If you want to hear that everything the Republicans say is right watch FOX News.

    You mention Walter Cronkite, who died in 2009, who was the one person Americans could count on to get the truth during the Vietnam war. Following a visit to Vietnam Cronkite delivered a very critical report on the was. Lyndon Johnson is reported to have remarked, "If we've lost Cronkite, we've lost the country." Cronkite was also called "The most trusted man in America."

    With the advent of news departments being required to make a profit, their objectivity has been strained, and in too many cases completely destroyed. As the son of a journalist who valued his integrity above all else, this pains me greatly.

    Here is a link to an article you will hopefully find interesting.

    http://www.teenink.com/opinion/current_events_p...
  • It's not just objectivity in journalism; objectivity itself seems to be dying, if it isn't already dead [At least in the attitudes of most people]. The MSNBCs and FOXs of the world shouldn't be too surprising - postmodern people tend to reject objectivity in favor of story, and the stories they choose are the ones that "work" for them. The profit motive is, I fear, just one of several nails in the coffin of journalistic objectivity. You're right, and as we sort ourselves into narrower categories, we hear less variety of perspective and lose our ability to engage in public discourse.
blog comments powered by Disqus