The Coming Death or Rebirth of Church Publishing

A Church article with View Comments posted 27 August 2008.
Tags: , , , , , , ,

This article is #2 in the 8 part series Freedom Software and the Church

Every church I’ve ever attended has had to spend time, energy, and money contending with copyright infringement. Every duplicated hymn in the bulletin, every extra copy of music for the musicians, etc. is potentially a source of copyright violations. Many churches work hard to prevent this kind of problem with organizations like CCLI (Christian Copyright Licensing International) and with licensing agreements through church publishing houses, but I’ve yet to find a church which fully complies with copyright law.

On one hand, paying for worship resources guarantees that the church can continue to develop high quality products in the future. On the other hand, licensing can be expensive, especially for small churches. Also, copyright enforcement actions effectively pit Christian against Christian and bring new meaning to “robbing Peter to pay Paul.” Sliding-scale payment schemes go a long way towards making resources accessible to small churches, but they are imperfect at best. What can be done?

Don Parris at Blue-Gnu recently began developing a hymnal for his small church which will feature music which is free as in free speech or the “freedom” in “freedom software.” Most of the hymns will be derived from The Cyber Hymnal, which is a huge collection of public domain hymns.

In some senses this begins to help solve the problem of free access to worship resources for smaller congregations, though by not including musical scores and liturgy resources this kind of hymnal would not offer enough for a typical Lutheran church. With the growing popularity of electronic distribution and video projection in church sanctuaries, physical copies of worship resources are becoming less important. Few would dispute, I think, that church publishing houses (and big name publishers in general) are becoming less significant as the Internet grows. If electronic distribution of worship resources becomes the norm, the Freedom mindset of the Internet will have done to church publishers what it has already done to newspapers: crippled their power and forced them to adapt to a situation where widespread usage without compensation is the norm.

Electronic distribution, technology in worship, and other forces are already redefining church publishers’ landscape in the same way that blogging did for newspapers. Just as newspapers ignored, then ridiculed, and then desperately embraced blogging as the Internet culture redefined news distribution, publishers are also beginning to face the same kind of changes with projects like Parris’ freedom hymnal. I hope they will learn from the mistakes and delays of the newspapers and embrace free (and freedom) distribution before they are smashed by new technology.

Air 1 and the Copyright Royalty Board

A Church article with View Comments posted 11 May 2007.
Tags: ,

I wrote earlier on the injustice of the Copyright Royalty Board’s recent retroactive ruling regarding internet radio. I just heard back yesterday from Kenneth Turner at EMF Broadcasting, the corporation behind Air 1 and K-LOVE. Here’s what he had to say:

I appreciate your concern. At this time, it’s too early to tell what, if
any, impact this would have on Air 1. That said, we are working
diligently with the various parties involved and hope to come to an
reasonable solution.

If this ruling goes through in its current state, it is entirely
possible that many webcasters would have to shut down due to the high
costs involved. We hope it doesn’t come to that and would appreciate
your prayers for a favorable outcome so that Air 1 can keep on
streaming.

Most people’s concern about the Copyright Royalty Board ruling is for small internet radio stations, not a corporate giant like EMF. Nevertheless, it sounds like even large terrestrial broadcasters like EMF might be forced to shut down their internet radio feeds unless something is done soon.

Save Internet Radio

A Church article with View Comments posted 18 April 2007.
Tags: ,

Just found out that the Copyright Royalty Board, the federal board appointed by Congress to set royalty rates on music (among other things), has decided to change how Internet radio broadcasters are charged for broadcasting copyrighted music. Instead of the current percentage-of-profit approach, broadcasters will now be charged per-listener, per-song. This will destroy Internet radio for several reasons:

  1. Rates will skyrocket more than 30% year over year for several years under the new plan.
  2. For most Internet radio stations, the fee schedule will represent over 100% of their revenues.
  3. The change is retroactively effective to the beginning of 2006.

It’s also worth noting that by charging retroactively to the beginning of 2006, this could be considered an unconstitutional ex post facto law.

This may also have implications for terrestrial radio stations that broadcast online, like Christian radio giant Air1. I’ve contacted them for more details.

In the meantime, I encourage everyone to visit Save Our Internet Radio for more information and then sign the petition to protect Internet radio.